State of the Industry Update
By Alvin E. Rice, President, Multi-Pure®
Written by Paula I. Rice, Vice President, Administration, Multi-Pure®
March 3, 2003 - As in years past, there
is a familiar theme in the industry. The concern over water
pollution is rising
as is the need for more funding to ensure the safety of America’s
water supplies. This is the way it's been for much of Multi-Pure®'s
32 year history, and it appears that it will remain that way.
Over the past few months there have been numerous headlines
such as:
“Billions in funding needed
to improve water quality”
“Feds pushed to fund solutions
to US infrastructure woes.”
“Indiana may need $13.9
Billion to ensure safe water”
In almost every state, millions to billions of dollars in
funding is needed to improve water quality. Here are some examples:
- The EPA, in its "Clean Water and Drinking Water Infrastructure
Gap Analysis," has documented a water and wastewater infrastructure
funding gap of as much as $500 billion.
- In California, experts concluded that $23 billion to $170
billion would be needed over a 20-year period to implement
recently adopted stormwater rules.
- Voters in San Francisco approved the
largest bond measure, $1.6 billion, in the city’s history
to pay for repairs to its aging water system.
- Aurora, Colorado city officials plan to float bond issues
totaling $290 million to buy water and build infrastructure.
- Voters in Tarpon Springs, Florida gave
the city per- mission to borrow as much as $18 million
to pay for badly needed
improvements to the city’s water and sewer system.
- The Governor of Maryland pledged more than $90 million
to improve drinking water supplies and sewage systems.
- The Bush Administration is seeking a
$150 million increase in Superfund hazardous waste site
cleanup funding in the
EPA’s 2004 budget.
The need for billions of dollars to improve
water quality across the United States is a clear sign that
the nation’s
drinking water is not as clean as Americans are led to believe.
The public water utilities publish annual “Consumer Confidence
Reports” (CCRs) telling the members of their communities that
they can trust their tap water. But, the Natural Resources
Defense Council’s Erik Olson says he “detects a ‘schizophrenic
element in industry assurances. The water providers say we
need hundreds of billions of dollars to fix the system, but
when people ask, ‘Is there a public health issue?’ they say, ‘No,
no.’ But, clearly there’s a public-health problem,” says Olson.
The nation’s drinking water is more polluted than ever and
millions of Americans suffer from the illnesses caused by contaminated
water. “Threats to water quality and quantity pose the biggest
environmental challenge, in large part because of antiquated
and deteriorating water systems,” warned Christine Whitman,
head of the U.S. EPA. A study by the Harvard University School
of Public Health cited public water infrastructure such as
pipes, many of which are more than a century old; waterborne
disease; land use, groundwater and surface water contamination;
and ineffective government regulations as challenges facing
our drinking water supplies in the next century.
The recent requests for funding for water-related
projects costing hundreds of billions of dollars have called
the public’s
attention to water pollution or the potential for pollution.
According to a statewide survey, more than
70% of Californians do not drink straight tap water in their
homes. Thirty-two
percent (32%) drink filtered water and the remainder drink
bottled water. This leads us to believe that Californians don’t
think much of the government’s ability to protect the environment.
In North Carolina an environmental group
reports that the state’s enforcement of water protection
laws suffers from staff shortages, lack of legislative support,
and too-friendly relationships
with violators.
The first nationwide study of 32 common toxic chemicals shows
that for 200 million Americans, the pollutants pose a cancer
risk 100 times greater than what the EPA usually considers
acceptable. The data released suggest that 200 million Americans
(about 75% of the total U.S. population) face an increased
risk of developing cancer from these pollutants.
Factories, electric utilities, and hazardous
waste management facilities in the U.S. and Canada generated
almost 3.4 million
metric tons of toxic chemical waste in 1999. The wastes include
269,000 tons of chemicals known to cause cancer, birth defects
or other reproductive problems. The report, released by the
Commission for Environmental Cooperation of North America,
includes data on 210 chemical substances. The manufacturing
sector’s 25% reduction in releases of toxic substances to air
was offset by a 26% increase in releases of toxic substances
to lakes, rivers and streams.
More than 76,000 leaking underground storage
tanks across the country are polluting the nation’s groundwater,
while the U.S. EPA can do little to solve the problem. According
to a
Congressional watchdog, the leaks of hazardous substances could
be eliminated if Congress and the EPA would improve inspections
and provide the necessary authority to bring tank owners into
compliance with existing regulations.
A government analysis shows the nation’s
waterways are awash in traces of chemicals used in beauty
aids, medications, cleaners,
and foods. Among the substances: caffeine, contraceptives,
painkillers, insect repellent, perfumes, and nicotine. Scientists
say the problem is that these substances largely escape regulation
and defy municipal wastewater treatment. And the long-term
effects of exposure are unclear, they say.
Nearly 30 percent of the nation's largest
industrial, municipal, and federal facilities were in violation
of the Clean Water
Act at least once during a recent 15-month period, according
to a report released by U.S. PIRG. "Permit to Pollute: How
the Government’s Lax Enforcement of the Clean Water Act is
Poisoning our Waters” claims that there are shortcomings in
the monitoring of water pollution and efforts to deter polluters,
at a time when the EPA's budget for enforcement faces slashing.
Although the EPA forced polluters to spend $3.9
billion on new controls and cleanups last year, that amount
was 11 percent less than in 2001. Legal actions
by the EPA that resulted in civil penalties paid by polluters dropped by
almost half, to $55.5 million. Criminal penalties dropped by
a third, to $62.2 million.
However, penalties from EPA administrative actions rose 8 percent to $25.7
million.
The EPA reported that Superfund cleanups from companies responsible
for polluting sites fell by nearly two-thirds, to $627 million,
compared with $1.7 billion the previous year, the agency said.
Federal investigators say there’s a disturbing trend of fake
tests of water supplies, part of a wider problem of false environmental
tests by private companies on petroleum products, underground
storage tanks and soil. “Several current lab fraud investigations
involve severe manipulation of data used to evaluate the compliance
of public water supplies and federal drinking water standards,” reported
the EPA’s inspector general, Nikki Tinsley. Faked test results
mislead regulators and the public into thinking they are being
protected by laws when, in fact they are not.
The public is not made aware of contaminants that linger in
the environment for many, many years. And it takes many more
years to clean up the pollution after it is found. Here are
some recent reports of long-term pollution problems:
Michigan: State officials planned to test drinking
water at 12 municipal water plants over concerns that contaminants
up to 40 years old might have spread downstream from a dredging
site in the St. Clair River. Sediments in the river contain
a range of chemicals dumped there over the years by a Dow Chemical
Company plant. About 6 million people in southeast Michigan
get their drinking water from water treatment plants along
the river and lake.
California: The San Lorenzo River
will be cleaned up, 40 years after hazardous chemicals
seeped from a dry-cleaning
business into the river. The dry-cleaning business closed
40 years ago, but the solvent, PCE, which has contaminated
soil
and groundwater, wasn’t discovered until 1985 by the Santa
Cruz, CA Water Department. Santa Cruz uses San Lorenzo
water to supply 90,000 customers.
California: State water officials first learned, more
than three years ago, that wells in Sebastopol were contaminated
with dangerous chemicals. A lack of funding prevented earlier
investigation. For now, the source of the contamination and
how long it has been in the groundwater is a mystery. Tests
have so far detected chemicals PCE (tetrachloroethylene) and
TCE (trichloroethylene) in at least 13 wells in the area.
Oregon: In Beaverton some of the most TCE-contaminated
water was found at a now-shuttered plant.
Indiana: In Martinsville, city officials shut down a well
and began planning expensive options to clean up the drinking
water supply when PCE was found
to be leaking into the water system. State environmental officials are looking
for the source of the PCE. They said the problem could be the legacy of chemicals
dumped or buried decades ago.
Anywhere, USA: The US EPA released new information
that says trichloroethylene (TCE) is more dangerous than previously
thought -- two to 40 times more toxic when ingested. TCE is
suspected of causing an increased risk of illnesses from nerve
damage to cancer.
California: A public interest group said more than
70 billion gallons of California groundwater is undrinkable
because of contamination by MTBE and other contaminants. The
polluted water is enough to supply 400,000 families for a year.
Indiana: Kids drank MTBE-laced water at their elementary
school for at least two years. The children could have been
drinking the tainted water for a longer period because the
school only began testing for MTBE in 2000. A service station
was found to be the primary source of the methyl tertiary butyl
ether (MTBE), a possible human carcinogen.
California: In a landmark case,
a San Francisco jury has found that gasoline with the
additive MTBE is a defective
product and that two oil companies were aware of the chemical’s
dangers but withheld the information when they put it on
the market.
Maine: The Richmond Utilities District told its customers
about the presence of elevated lead levels in the water of
two out of ten homes. The town had not failed a lead test until
last fall, and notices were sent to customers with their bills
in January. Lead may cause nervous system disorders and brain
and kidney damage. It is very harmful to unborn children and
children under 3 years old.
Maryland: More than a decade after the discovery of
excess levels of lead, school officials shut off water fountains
in the district. The City Health Commissioner said most of
the fountains were shut down by 1993, but many were somehow
reactivated.
Anytown, USA: The common dentist
office practice of flushing old mercury-containing fillings
down the drain makes
dentists the largest discharger of the toxic metal into
the nation’s wastewater treatment plants, according to a
national study by a Boston-based public health group. Most
of the mercury
is eventually discharged into bodies of water.
New York: Tests of wells near areas where there has
been high pesticide use continue to show contamination in the
groundwater. From April 2000 to March 2001, pesticides were
found in about half the private wells tested in the Suffolk
area. There were 323 wells that had more than one pesticide
compound; 131 contained five or more. The tests detected 52
pesticides and compounds created by the breakdown of pesticides.
For 37 of the new compounds there is no specific drinking water
standard. It is unclear what cumulative effect, if any, combinations
of the different compounds have.
Anywhere, USA: The US EPA is considering
an increase in the amount of atrazine allowed to be contained
in drinking
water – from three parts per billion (3 ppb) to as high as
12 ppb. Atrazine is the second most common pesticide found
in private and community water wells and has been a popular,
affordable chemical among farmers since the 1960s. A couple
of years ago, EPA upgraded its assessment of atrazine from
a “possible” to a “likely” carcinogen, but it has been working
to provide a more concrete assessment. Some have maintained
the herbicide is less harmful than suspected; while in Europe,
the substance is largely banned. The EPA concluded that atrazine
may continue to be used, provided all the precautions and
some new specific measures are implemented to reduce risks
to drinking
water.
Illinois: An herbicide that has the potential to cause
liver damage was found in samples of water taken at a school
in the St. Charles suburb of Chicago. A consulting firm was
hired for an environmental analysis of the school water in
the wake of teacher health complaints over the last 27 years.
Officials decided to turn off the water to the school until
a charcoal filter that will remove the herbicide is installed.
Oregon: Unsafe levels of the toxin PCB recently discovered
in freshwater clams and crawfish were caused by electrical
debris dumped in the Columbia River according to a report released
by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The debris was discovered
in 2000 at a site where household waste and project debris
were dumped until 1982.
Alabama: Residents of Anniston have learned that for
nearly 40 years, while producing the now-banned industrial
coolants known as PCBs at a local factory, Monsanto Company
routinely discharged toxic waste into a creek and dumped millions
of pounds of PCBs into open-pit landfills.
Florida: Toxic wood-treating chemicals,
including Benzene, have leached from a federally designated
hazardous waste site,
to within 35 feet of the Floridian Aquifer and could threaten
the city of Gainesville’s drinking water supply.
Maryland: Maryland’s tap water may
be putting women at risk of having pregnancies end in
miscarriage or having
children with birth defects, according to a report by two
environmental groups. 14 communities in Maryland had a relatively
high proportion
of people projected to be at risk from using their local
drinking water, which is contaminated by trihalomethanes,
one of the
principal byproducts of chlorination.
Virginia: Nearly 200 women in Chesapeake sued their
water system, claiming that miscarriages they suffered in the
1980s and 1990s are traceable to trihalomethanes.
Texas: Bonham residents and businesses received written
notice that their drinking water is contaminated with trihalomethanes.
However, public works officials and Texas experts say the water
is safe. The city of Bonham has been instructed to make adjustments
to the disinfecting process to reduce the level of trihalomethanes.
There are many other reports of contamination incidents, surveys
and studies that produce frightening results, and Americans
everywhere are shocked and disappointed by the failure of public
agencies to protect the health of residents in the communities
they serve.
Consumer awareness of water contamination problems combined
with the desire for a better quality of life are factors contributing
to the robust growth of the drinking water treatment industry.
Last year, Multi-Pure® produced more carbon block filters than
ever. Demand for high-quality drinking water treatment devices
is at an all-time high and growing. And, we anticipate that
in the not too distant future, every home will have a drinking
water treatment device.
The Business Communications Company, Inc., a market research
group, recently reported that the market for consumer water
treatment systems and products is estimated at $1.5 billion.
According to the study, the combination of water-quality awareness
and growing regulatory scrutiny will continue to drive the
growth of the market at an average annual rate of 8.5%, to
more than $2.2 billion by 2006.
Multi-Pure® Independent
Distributors can offer to the members of their community the
most effective drinking water treatment
device available on the market. Testing and certification by
NSF International
confirm the outstanding performance of Multi-Pure® Drinking
Water Systems. Here is how the NSF listings break down:
Of the thousands of drinking water treatment devices available
on the marketplace, most only provide minimal protection. It
is more important than ever for consumers to carefully look
at the certification of a product to confirm that it will provide
the performance they need and are seeking.
The distinctive competitive advantages of Multi-Pure® Drinking
Water Systems are clearly confirmed by testing and certification.
Although the performance of Multi-Pure®’s solid carbon block
filters are the best in the world, we continuously strive to
develop an even better filter. Currently Multi-Pure® has several
research and development projects in process, including testing
for the removal of Arsenic V. A new ANSI/NSF standard for testing
Arsenic V was released in June, 2002. Internal testing against
that standard has produced very encouraging results. We are
optimistic that we’ll have more to say about Arsenic V later
this year.
Also, we are in the very early stages of testing for Arsenic
III, which is more difficult to remove than Arsenic V, as well
as Perchlorate, a rocket fuel component that recently was found
in water supplies in many western states. There are no standards
for Arsenic III or Perchlorate, so we anticipate that it will
take several years for these projects to be completed.
We continuously look for materials that would be effective
in meeting the Fluoride standard. Unfortunately, we have nothing
encouraging to report about the Fluoride research at this time.
Although research and development requires a
significant commitment of resources, we are confident that
our efforts will produce an even better drinking water
treatment device in the future.
Multi-Pure®’s solid carbon
block filters were the:
- FIRST to be certified to reduce lead
- FIRST to be certified to reduce asbestos
- FIRST to be certified to reduce Cyst
- FIRST to
be registered by the State of California, Department
of Health Services
- FIRST to be certified to reduce Chloramine
- FIRST
to be certified to reduce Toxaphene
- FIRST to be certified
to reduce Chlordane
- FIRST to be certified to reduce PCBs
And will be the:
- FIRST to meet new standards in the future.
Distributors are encouraged to be even more diligent in helping
their friends, family, neighbors, and others who are or will
be looking to buy an effective drinking water system for protection
against contaminants that may be in their tap water.
People in California, North Carolina, and elsewhere, have
lost confidence in their tap water, and many of them are spending
large sums of money for bottled water, the quality of which
is questionable. Multi-Pure® Drinking Water System are a cost-effective
option that will provide customers with the highest quality
water possible. Multi-Pure® also provides a business opportunity
that will not only pay for their own unit, but also start down
the path towards financial freedom.
There are 200 million Americans who, today, face an increased
risk of developing cancer from common toxic chemicals. They
live in almost every community and they need our distributor's
help.
Although the EPA thinks it can do little
to solve the problem of leaking underground storage tanks
polluting the nation’s
groundwater, Multi-Pure® distributors can do something – talk
about Multi-Pure®’s effectiveness in reducing contaminants such
as MTBE, benzene, etc.
The public water utilities may report that
they are not able to do anything about the contraceptives,
painkillers, insect
repellents, perfumes, and nicotine that are found in the nation’s
waterways. Although there are no standards for testing for
the presence of the pharmaceutical and personal care pollutants
(PPCPs), according to Christian Daughton of the Environmental
Protection Agency, carbon filters and RO systems will remove
them. So, our distributors can do something – they can offer
their neighbors a Multi-Pure® Drinking Water System that will
give them peace of mind.
People in any town where chemicals, herbicides, and pesticides
have been found in drinking water supplies can be provided
with a drinking water system that will protect them and their
families.
Multi-Pure® distributors can offer those people around the
country, where toxic heavy metals are found in water sources,
an effective drinking water filter for protection against these
insidious contaminants.
Residents in Oregon and Alabama where PCBs have been found
in their drinking water need our distributor's help. There
are only nineteen (19) devices certified to reduce PCBs; six
(6) are Multi-Pure® Drinking Water Systems.
87% of Americans are drinking water disinfected with chlorine
or chloramine. Disinfecting public water supplies is essential
to assuring the microbiological safety of our drinking water;
however it often leads to harmful byproducts such as trihalomethanes
that have been linked to many human cancers and put pregnant
women at a higher risk for miscarriages. Only a few drinking
water treatment devices are certified to reduce trihalomethanes
and other disinfection byproducts. Multi-Pure® Drinking Water
Systems are among those few.
It would be inappropriate to state that Multi-Pure® units will
reduce any and all contaminants, including those that could
be introduced by terrorists. However the effectiveness of Multi-Pure®
Drinking Water Systems to reduce one of the widest range of
contaminants of health concern make it the best choice for
anybody concerned about the safety of their water.
To paraphrase famed newscaster Paul Harvey: There really is
a drinking water problem in America. There really is a fabulous
solution to the drinking water quality problem in your community.
The Multi-Pure® Drinking Water System really is a product that
can make a difference in the lives of the people you know.
Multi-Pure® customers and distributors have the peace of mind
that comes from knowing that every day they are using the most
effective drinking water treatment device available. Our distributors
can appropriately and ethically share their knowledge and experience
with the people in their community. On April 22nd, Earth Day,
it will be a great opportunity to talk to neighbors and friends
about how they can live healthier lives. Again in May, during
National Drinking Water Week, many communities will focus on
water quality issues. This is a perfect opportunity to tell
people about Multi-Pure® Drinking Water Systems. Every day distributors
can seize the opportunities to tell others that there really
is a fabulous solution to the drinking water quality problem
in their community. The Multi-Pure® Drinking Water System really
is a product that can make a difference for everybody. |